Let me take a moment to go a little further into detail on these things, because while another technician would read that and understand and follow me, I want regular people (read: non-geeks/nerds) to be able to understand me.
HijackThis!, as many techs will tell you, merely looks at all the stuff that's touched Windows recently and left its mark in one way or another - it doesn't tell you whether or not what you're looking at is necessarily good or bad - and what is running, both now and when the system starts up. If you don't know what you're looking at, it's like sending a suburbanite to a restaurant in a remote Chinese village and asking them to be able to read and understand the menu.
In 30 seconds.
While it's difficult to understand for most people, technicians know what to look for - things like MySearchNow or MyWebSearch or AOL.COM Toolbar usually don't belong in here, though they frequently take liberties with your machine and put things where they don't belong and cause problems. It's like turning the TV on to watch the news and having Brian Williams drag his desk into your apartment and work from there - not really all that helpful and prevents you from getting around your home, just to say you're getting news and alerts directly from Brian Williams himself.
Yet a lot of people don't realize that's what they do when they install toolbars from search engines (yes, Google included) or "search assistants" or programs like that. Yes, you're getting a service from this company, but the hassle and load on your system isn't worth it.
Getting back to the stage computer, HijackThis! finished its scan and came back with about 75 objects. Sounds like a lot, until you realize that maybe fifty of those are actually required, and the rest aren't. So we're down to twenty-five and of those twenty-five, ten were installed with "good" programs, and fifteen were installed surrupticiously by toolbars or search assistant programs - "bad" programs. The ten good listings are OK - they're pulling down some resources but not that many. It's the fifteen bad listings that I'm worried about - they aren't supposed to be there, and they open up programs that slow down the computer by a significant margin. There doesn't have to be more than a handful of them - one is usually more than enough - so you probably see how fifteen is a bad thing here. I cleared out the twenty-five offenders, finished a spyware scan by Ad-Aware which basically did nothing more than clear out the programs associated with those fifteen listings and cleared out the cookies and temporary files Internet Explorer had downloaded to make browsing quicker, and restarted.
As with any machine that this procedure is done with, the system was immediately quicker and far more responsive. It was almost as though this was a new computer.
There are times where I feel as though this procedure would work with government in general - find the crap, filter it out, and watch everything perk back up quickly. I'm sure something along the lines of HijackThis! would work wonders if it were possible to apply it to the government - we could watch the mighty federal bureaucracy melt away and the economy and free expression bolt upright, ushering our nation into a new golden age. I want to see a flowchart of our government right now and start snipping off parts that aren't necessary and are ridiculously outdated. Pruning, basically.
I'm a firm believer in the concept that government isn't the solution, it's the problem. Pull the government out of anything and the free market takes over. For example, let's take the education system here in the US. Completely unnecessary. It doesn't take a federal bureaucracy to raise a child - it takes two parents and love and dedication to that child. Yank out the federal government, allow the private sector to take over education and you'll instantly have a highly educated workforce. Why? Competition. Private schools compete now - they'll really dial it up when the government isn't involved.
I'm not saying that all government services are non-essential and useless - I'm saying that we have a lot of things that we just don't need. The services provided by NASA, for example, are almost completely unnecessary and being handled by private-sector organizations at this point. Is it nice to think that the government can send scientists into space? Sure. Is it worth using taxpayer dollars? Nope. Let the private sector take over - they do a much better job with research anyway. FEMA is another big example: do you really need an agency to manage the government in an emergency? Think about that for a second - we already have mayors, state congressmen and state senators, so why do we need the federal government to step in? If the government wants to supply funds to take care of getting essential services up and running, they can do so independent of local governments. I'm sure I don't have to say it but the situation after Hurricane Katrina is a perfect example of why FEMA is more of a hinderance than a help. The entire situation could have been resolved much faster if, pardon the phrase, private businesses and organziations had been allowed to open the floodgates of charity without limit on the area. As it turns out, though, there are giant portions of the city which sit uninhabitable thanks to the still-existing flood damage in the area. Contractors from other areas aren't allowed to come in and assist except in a volunteer capacity or under a strict policy where their prices are fixed at a certain point and cannot be raised or lowered. Supposedly this is to prevent price gouging and to allow common citizens to be able to rebuild. As I'm sure you realize, government control over markets is a bad thing.
So let's start on a project. I'm going to start reviewing government entities and we'll, together, you and I, start removing or reducing those departments or agencies which can be privatized or removed or combined together. Here are some ground rules, though:
1) We're sticking with the federal level. States are in some cases more corrupt and more in need of help than the feds (believe me, I live in Northern NJ's largest city and work in NYC - I'm no stranger to political corruption around me), but if you take pressure off the feds, it will trickle down to the states anyway.
2) Let's keep it nice and happy (or at least neutral) in the comments - no attacks on this politician or that politician. I will delete your comments and have you blacklisted. I want this to be an open forum and I strongly believe in and support the right to freedom of speech but I believe more strongly in responsible speech. If you have a qualm with a particular politician or movement, you and I can communicate via email.
3) DoD is off-limits. We're in the middle of a war, so defense/war spending is off the table. Yes, I know there's a lot of money being spent on the war, but my point in doing this is long-term planning and budgeting. Even if the war ends tomorrow, we're still going to need to keep our defenses funded and maintain our forces. There are a million other places we can pull funds from - let's try and find them in the budget and move on from there.
4) Homeland Security is not off-limits, though scaling back certain operations is not a good idea. If its operations can be accomplished by using less expensive resources and less overhead, then tell us all how.
Have at it!